Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Mayo Clinic in MN violated the religious beliefs of its employees when refusing to accommodate their views pertaining to COVID mandates.
This is good news. It should never even had been a issue. MAYO does not own those that work for it. As an alleged world renowned hospital they should have known that NO jab or medicine is 100% safe or effective. Now one has to question just how good of hospital it truly is.
They let a fraud - Fauci and someone with dementia take over and make health decisions.
They to this day require the death vax to get a transplant.
Why do we need an exemption from being murdered? There are already laws that are against killing people. Murder is already ready a crime. Assault and battery is already a crime.
This is good news. It should never even had been a issue. MAYO does not own those that work for it. As an alleged world renowned hospital they should have known that NO jab or medicine is 100% safe or effective. Now one has to question just how good of hospital it truly is.
They let a fraud - Fauci and someone with dementia take over and make health decisions.
They to this day require the death vax to get a transplant.
"The body is a temple" and "fetal cell lines are against my religion" FOR THE WIN!
So AMAZING! As it SHOULD BE, these rights should NOT have been so hard to protect!
May other states take hold of this and RUN WITH IT!
Why do we need an exemption from being murdered? There are already laws that are against killing people. Murder is already ready a crime. Assault and battery is already a crime.
We as honest people who possess intact consciences know this. But we’re not being governed by people like us.
Those in power yearn to shed innocent human blood.
Make the sign of the cross over them
Absolutely 👍
Long time coming.
Too long.
I pray they get all the back pay for being fired
Right.
So amazing unfortunately these lawsuits should have never been necessary. The law was clear from day one.
https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ajhp/zxae031/7606814?redirectedFrom=fulltext